lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36369388-e9c8-22cd-8c19-e2bdf2d0389b@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:37:35 +0300
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
CC:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Adam Ford <adam.ford@...icpd.com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/omap: Migrate minimum FCK/PCK ratio from Kconfig to
 dts

On 27/09/2019 16:47, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 27/09/2019 15:33, Adam Ford wrote:
> 
>>> It looks like a bug in omap clock handling.
>>>
>>> DSS uses dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2 as fclk. dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2 comes
>>> from dpll4_ck, and there's a divider after the PLL, dpll4_m4_ck.
>>>
>>> When the DSS driver sets dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2 rate to 27000000 or
>>> 27870967, which can be created with m4 dividers 32 and 31, it looks like
>>> the divider goes to bypass, or to a very small value. DSS gets a very
>>> high clock rate and breaks down.
>>
>> Is there anything I can do to help troubleshoot this?  I could insert
>> a hack that checks if we're omap3 and if so make the divider equal to
>> 4, but that seems like just a hack.
>> I can run more tests or insert code somewhere if you want.
> 
> I think it's up to someone who's knowledgeable in omap clock framework. 
> I'm kind of hoping that Tero or Tony would be willing to debug =). I can 
> try to find time to debug the omap clk framework, but I'll be going on 
> blindly there.

If you can provide details about what clock framework / driver does 
wrong (sample clk_set_xyz call sequence, expected results via 
clk_get_xyz, and what fails), I can take a look at it. Just reporting 
arbitrary display driver issues I won't be able to debug at all (I don't 
have access to any of the displays, nor do I want to waste time 
debugging them without absolutely no knowledge whatsoever.)

-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ