[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190928171158.4b72ab55@oasis.local.home>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:11:58 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Naveen Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args
before adding probe
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 02:59:08 -0700
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
> on existing probes. This also may set the error log index
> bigger than the number of command parameters. In that case
> it sets the error position is next to the last parameter.
>
> Fixes: ca89bc071d5e ("tracing/kprobe: Add multi-probe per event support")
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
I modified the change log a bit, below is the patch I plan on submitting.
You OK with this?
-- Steve
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:53:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args before
adding probe
Steven reported that a test triggered:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880c4f25a48 by task ftracetest/4798
CPU: 2 PID: 4798 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-test+ #30
Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7c/0xc0
? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
print_address_description+0x6c/0x332
? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
__kasan_report.cold.6+0x1a/0x3b
? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
kasan_report+0xe/0x12
trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
? print_kprobe_event+0x280/0x280
? match_held_lock+0x1b/0x240
? find_held_lock+0xac/0xd0
? fs_reclaim_release.part.112+0x5/0x20
? lock_downgrade+0x350/0x350
? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x30/0x40
? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.6+0xc1/0xd0
? trace_kprobe_create+0xe40/0xe40
? trace_kprobe_create+0xe40/0xe40
create_or_delete_trace_kprobe+0x2e/0x60
trace_run_command+0xc3/0xe0
? trace_panic_handler+0x20/0x20
? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x30/0x40
trace_parse_run_command+0xdc/0x163
vfs_write+0xe1/0x240
ksys_write+0xba/0x150
? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50
? tracer_hardirqs_on+0x61/0x180
? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x43/0x110
? mark_held_locks+0x29/0xa0
? do_syscall_64+0x14/0x260
do_syscall_64+0x68/0x260
Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
on existing probes. This also may set the error log index
bigger than the number of command parameters. In that case
it sets the error position is next to the last parameter.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/156966474783.3478.13217501608215769150.stgit@devnote2
Fixes: ca89bc071d5e ("tracing/kprobe: Add multi-probe per event support")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
index baf58a3612c0..905b10af5d5c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
@@ -178,6 +178,16 @@ void __trace_probe_log_err(int offset, int err_type)
if (!command)
return;
+ if (trace_probe_log.index >= trace_probe_log.argc) {
+ /**
+ * Set the error position is next to the last arg + space.
+ * Note that len includes the terminal null and the cursor
+ * appaers at pos + 1.
+ */
+ pos = len;
+ offset = 0;
+ }
+
/* And make a command string from argv array */
p = command;
for (i = 0; i < trace_probe_log.argc; i++) {
@@ -1084,6 +1094,12 @@ int trace_probe_compare_arg_type(struct trace_probe *a, struct trace_probe *b)
{
int i;
+ /* In case of more arguments */
+ if (a->nr_args < b->nr_args)
+ return a->nr_args + 1;
+ if (a->nr_args > b->nr_args)
+ return b->nr_args + 1;
+
for (i = 0; i < a->nr_args; i++) {
if ((b->nr_args <= i) ||
((a->args[i].type != b->args[i].type) ||
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists