linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vio: use simple dummy struct device as bus parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOZ2QJP2bf=MpKgnTaW4vbLAbOpivyXgdmcijGTMezOpJWaufQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Sep 2019 09:28:47 -0400
From:   Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...onical.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vio: use simple dummy struct device as bus parent

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 3:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:48:49PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 2:19 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:04:02AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > > > The dummy vio_bus_device creates the /sys/devices/vio directory, which
> > > > contains real vio devices under it; since it represents itself as having
> > > > a bus = &vio_bus_type, its /sys/devices/vio/uevent does call the bus's
> > > > .uevent function, vio_hotplug(), and as that function won't find a real
> > > > device for the dummy vio_dev, it will return -ENODEV.
> > > >
> > > > One of the main users of the uevent node is udevadm, e.g. when it is called
> > > > with 'udevadm trigger --devices'.  Up until recently, it would ignore any
> > > > errors returned when writing to devices' uevent file, but it was recently
> > > > changed to start returning error if it gets an error writing to any uevent
> > > > file:
> > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/97afc0351a96e0daa83964df33937967c75c644f
> > > >
> > > > since the /sys/devices/vio/uevent file has always returned ENODEV from
> > > > any write to it, this now causes the udevadm trigger command to return
> > > > an error.  This may be fixed in udevadm to ignore ENODEV errors, but the
> > > > vio driver should still be fixed.
> > > >
> > > > This patch changes the arch/powerpc/platform/pseries/vio.c 'dummy'
> > > > parent device into a real dummy device with no .bus, so its uevent
> > > > file will stop returning ENODEV and simply do nothing and return 0.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...onical.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 11 ++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > > > index 79e2287991db..63bc16631680 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > > > @@ -32,11 +32,8 @@
> > > >  #include <asm/page.h>
> > > >  #include <asm/hvcall.h>
> > > >
> > > > -static struct vio_dev vio_bus_device  = { /* fake "parent" device */
> > > > -     .name = "vio",
> > > > -     .type = "",
> > > > -     .dev.init_name = "vio",
> > > > -     .dev.bus = &vio_bus_type,
> > > > +static struct device vio_bus = {
> > > > +     .init_name      = "vio",
> > >
> > > Eeek, no!  Why are you creating a static device that will then be
> > > reference counted?  Not nice :(
> >
> > sorry!  I'll admit that I simply copied what drivers/base/platform.c
> > seemed to be doing.
>
> I don't see platform.c having a 'static struct device' anywhere in it,
> am I missing it in my searching?

no, you are right, what I meant was:

struct device platform_bus = {
        .init_name      = "platform",
};


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h