lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:49:59 +0100
From:   Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: aardvark: Don't rely on jiffies while holding
 spinlock

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:45:55AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:55:02 +0200
> Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt> wrote:
> 
> > advk_pcie_wait_pio() can be called while holding a spinlock (from
> > pci_bus_read_config_dword()), then depends on jiffies in order to
> > timeout while polling on PIO state registers. In the case the PIO
> > transaction failed, the timeout will never happen and will also cause
> > the cpu to stall.
> > 
> > This decrements a variable and wait instead of using jiffies.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>
> 
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
> 

Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>

> Thanks!
> 
> Thomas
> -- 
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ