[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43edc2f2-5b42-0cd7-1573-af77fd9e6678@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:36:16 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 53/63] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment bitmap
of LFS curseg
Hello,
On 2019/9/30 15:21, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> + for (blkofs += 1; blkofs < sbi->blocks_per_seg; blkofs++) {
>> + if (!f2fs_test_bit(blkofs, se->cur_valid_map))
>> + continue;
>> +out:
>> + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR,
>> + "Current segment's next free block offset is "
>> + "inconsistent with bitmap, logtype:%u, "
>> + "segno:%u, type:%u, next_blkoff:%u, blkofs:%u",
>> + i, curseg->segno, curseg->alloc_type,
>> + curseg->next_blkoff, blkofs);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> So this is detecting filesystem corruption, right? Should it be
> -EUCLEAN?
Was fixed in another commit 10f966bbf521 ("f2fs: use generic
EFSBADCRC/EFSCORRUPTED"). :)
Thanks,
>
> Pavel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists