linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 53/63] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment bitmap of LFS curseg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:21:57 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 53/63] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment
 bitmap of LFS curseg

Hi!


> +		for (blkofs += 1; blkofs < sbi->blocks_per_seg; blkofs++) {
> +			if (!f2fs_test_bit(blkofs, se->cur_valid_map))
> +				continue;
> +out:
> +			f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR,
> +				"Current segment's next free block offset is "
> +				"inconsistent with bitmap, logtype:%u, "
> +				"segno:%u, type:%u, next_blkoff:%u, blkofs:%u",
> +				i, curseg->segno, curseg->alloc_type,
> +				curseg->next_blkoff, blkofs);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

So this is detecting filesystem corruption, right? Should it be
-EUCLEAN?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html