[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001130343.4480afe3@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 13:03:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM / Domains: Add tracepoints
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:35:42 -0700
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> How about this instead:
>
> Add tracepoints for genpd_power_on, genpd_power_off and
> genpd_set_performance_state. The tracepoints can help with
> understanding power domain behavior of a given device, which
> may be particularly interesting for battery powered devices
> and suspend/resume.
Do you have a use case example to present?
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists