linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v22 06/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 22:10:14 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, serge.ayoun@...el.com,
        shay.katz-zamir@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        kai.svahn@...el.com, josh@...htriplett.org, luto@...nel.org,
        kai.huang@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 06/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data
 structures

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 06:27:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 05:26:37PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Define the SGX microarchitectural data structures used by various SGX
> > opcodes. This is not an exhaustive representation of all SGX data
> > structures but only those needed by the kernel.
> > 
> > [1] Intel SDM: 37.6 INTEL® SGX DATA STRUCTURES OVERVIEW
> 
> That footnote is not being referred to. Just make it a sentence.

Sure!

> Btw, you could tell your SDM folks to fix formulations like:
> 
> "The use of EAX is implied implicitly by the ENCLS, ENCLU, and ENCLV
> 		   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> instructions.... The use of additional registers does not use ModR/M
> encoding and is implied implicitly by the respective leaf function
> 		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> index."
> 
> "implied" alone wasn't enough I guess. :)

I'd guess have make it a double :-)

/Jarkko