[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191001082321.GL4519@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:23:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
ak@...ux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
like.xu@...el.com, ehankland@...gle.com, arbel.moshe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/vPMU: Add lazy mechanism to release
perf_event per vPMC
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:22:57PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> + union {
> + u8 event_count :7; /* the total number of created perf_events */
> + bool enable_cleanup :1;
That's atrocious, don't ever create a bitfield with base _Bool.
> + } state;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists