linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] scripts: Fix coccicheck failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1910011500470.13162@hadrien>
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Yuehaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, maennich@...gle.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] scripts: Fix coccicheck failed



On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Yuehaibing wrote:

> On 2019/9/30 0:32, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Yuehaibing wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019/9/28 20:43, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, YueHaibing wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Run make coccicheck, I got this:
> >>>>
> >>>> spatch -D patch --no-show-diff --very-quiet --cocci-file
> >>>>  ./scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci --dir .
> >>>>  -I ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated
> >>>>  -I ./include -I ./arch/x86/include/uapi
> >>>>  -I ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I ./include/uapi
> >>>>  -I ./include/generated/uapi --include ./include/linux/kconfig.h
> >>>>  --jobs 192 --chunksize 1
> >>>>
> >>>> virtual rule patch not supported
> >>>> coccicheck failed
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems add_namespace.cocci cannot be called in coccicheck.
> >>>
> >>> Could you explain the issue better?  Does the current state cause make
> >>> coccicheck to fail?  Or is it just silently not being called?
> >>
> >> Yes, it cause make coccicheck failed like this:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> ./drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c:290:2-8: preceding lock on line 243
> >> ./fs/fuse/dev.c:1227:2-8: preceding lock on line 1206
> >> ./fs/fuse/dev.c:1232:3-9: preceding lock on line 1206
> >> coccicheck failed
> >> make[1]: *** [coccicheck] Error 255
> >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >
> > Could you set the verbose options to see what the problem is?  Maybe the
> > problem would be solved by putting virtual report at the top of the rule.
> > But it might still fail because nothing can happen without a value for the
> > virtual metavariable ns.
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci
> index c832bb6445a8..99e93a6c2e24 100644
> --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/add_namespace.cocci
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  /// add a missing namespace tag to a module source file.
>  ///
>
> +virtual report
> +
>  @has_ns_import@
>  declarer name MODULE_IMPORT_NS;
>  identifier virtual.ns;
>
>
>
> Adding virtual report make the coccicheck go ahead smoothly.

Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>

Thanks.


>
> >
> > Should the coccinelle directory be only for things that work with make
> > coccicheck, or for all Coccinelle scripts?
> >
> > julia
> >
> > .
> >
>
>