[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191002064605.GA7405@osiris>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:46:05 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4-rc1 BUILD FIX] s390: mark __cpacf_query() as
__always_inline
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:08:01PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c calls on several places __cpacf_query() directly,
> which makes it impossible to meet the "i" constraint for the asm operands
> (opcode in this case).
>
> As we are now force-enabling CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on all
> architectures, this causes a build failure on s390:
>
> In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:44:
> ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function '__cpacf_query':
> ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:179:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints
> 179 | asm volatile(
> | ^~~
> ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:179:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
>
> Mark __cpacf_query() as __always_inline in order to fix that, analogically
> how we fixes __cpacf_check_opcode(), cpacf_query_func() and scpacf_query()
> already.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> Fixes: d83623c5eab2 ("s390: mark __cpacf_check_opcode() and cpacf_query_func() as __always_inline")
> Fixes: e60fb8bf68d4 ("s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline")
> Fixes: ac7c3e4ff401 ("compiler: enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING forcibly")
> Fixes: 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> ---
>
> I am wondering how is it possible that none of the build-testing
> infrastructure we have running against linux-next caught this? Not enough
> non-x86 coverage?
Well, there is plenty of s390 coverage with respect to daily builds
(also here). It doesn't fail for me with gcc 9.1; so you may either
have a different gcc version or different config options(?) so the
compiler decided to not inline the function. I'll apply this in any
case, since your patch is obviously fine.
Thanks!
> arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> index a092f63aac6a..c0f3bfeddcbe 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ typedef struct { unsigned char bytes[16]; } cpacf_mask_t;
> *
> * Returns 1 if @func is available for @opcode, 0 otherwise
> */
> -static inline void __cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask)
> +static __always_inline void __cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask)
> {
> register unsigned long r0 asm("0") = 0; /* query function */
> register unsigned long r1 asm("1") = (unsigned long) mask;
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists