linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4-rc1 BUILD FIX] s390: mark __cpacf_query() as __always

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191002064956.GB7405@osiris>
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:49:56 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4-rc1 BUILD FIX] s390: mark __cpacf_query() as
 __always_inline

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:46:05AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:08:01PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > I am wondering how is it possible that none of the build-testing 
> > infrastructure we have running against linux-next caught this? Not enough 
> > non-x86 coverage?
> 
> Well, there is plenty of s390 coverage with respect to daily builds
> (also here). It doesn't fail for me with gcc 9.1; so you may either
> have a different gcc version or different config options(?) so the
> compiler decided to not inline the function. I'll apply this in any
> case, since your patch is obviously fine.
> 
> Thanks!

Ok, Christian applied this already a couple of minutes earlier ;)