[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002085553.GA6226@pc-66.home>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:55:53 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: test_progs: don't leak server_fd
in test_sockopt_inherit
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 08:42:30PM -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the patches Andrii!
>
> Although Daniel fixed them and applied them correctly.
After last kernel/maintainer summit at LPC, I reworked all my patchwork scripts [0]
which I use for bpf trees in order to further reduce manual work and add more sanity
checks at the same time. Therefore, the broken Fixes: tag was a good test-case. ;-)
Thanks,
Daniel
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/pw.git/
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:20 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:40 AM Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > I don't think there is a need to add "test_progs:" to subject, "
> > test_sockopt_inherit" is specific enough ;)
> >
> > > server_fd needs to be close if pthread can't be created.
> >
> > typo: closed
> >
> > > Fixes: e3e02e1d9c24 ("selftests/bpf: test_progs: convert test_sockopt_inherit")
> > > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> >
> > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_inherit.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists