[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002085554.ddvx6yx6nx7tdeey@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 10:55:54 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
AlexeiStarovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
GregKroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Kill pr_warning in the whole linux code
Linus,
On Fri 2019-09-20 14:25:12, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> There are pr_warning and pr_warng to show WARNING level message,
> most of the code using pr_warn, number based on next-20190919,
>
> pr_warn: 5189 pr_warning: 546 (tools: 398, others: 148)
The ratio is 10:1 in favor of pr_warn(). It would make sense
to remove the pr_warning().
Would you accept pull request with these 32 simple patches
for rc2, please?
Alternative is to run a simple sed. But it is not trivial
to fix indentation of the related lines.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists