[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002101624.gljyf7g4nia2rcbx@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:16:24 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: sun4i: redundant assignment to variable pval
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The
> assignment is redundant and hence can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
> if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
> /* First, test without any prescaler when available */
> prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
> - pval = 1;
> /*
> * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds
> * is not an integer so round it half up instead of
Looks fine, the issue exists since
deb9c462f4e539cc7f8389b9855eb7a507c78e7e.
You can even make pval a local variable for the second for loop.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists