linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add a reason for reserved pages in has_unmovable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37b43978-5652-576c-8990-451e751b7c67@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:02:24 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add a reason for reserved pages in
 has_unmovable_pages()



On 10/03/2019 02:35 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 4:10 AM, Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Having unmovable pages on a given pageblock should be reported correctly
>> when required with REPORT_FAILURE flag. But there can be a scenario where a
>> reserved page in the page block will get reported as a generic "unmovable"
>> reason code. Instead this should be changed to a more appropriate reason
>> code like "Reserved page".
> 
> Isn’t this redundant as it dumps the flags in dump_page() anyway?

Even though page flags does contain reserved bit information, the problem
is that we are explicitly printing the reason for this page dump. In this
case it is caused by the fact that it is a reserved page.

page dumped because: <reason>

The proposed change makes it explicit that the dump is caused because a
non movable page with reserved bit set. It also helps in differentiating 
between reserved bit condition and the last one "if (found > count)".

> 
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 15c2050c629b..fbf93ea119d2 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -8206,8 +8206,10 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
>>
>>        page = pfn_to_page(check);
>>
>> -        if (PageReserved(page))
>> +        if (PageReserved(page)) {
>> +            reason = "Reserved page";
>>            goto unmovable;
>> +        }
>>
>>        /*
>>         * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>
>