[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157009522838.9978.6698411788206711401.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:33:48 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Bill Metzenthen <billm@...bpc.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86-ml" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/cpu] x86/math-emu: Check __copy_from_user() result
The following commit has been merged into the x86/cpu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: e6b44ce1925a8329a937c57f0d60ba0d9bb5d226
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e6b44ce1925a8329a937c57f0d60ba0d9bb5d226
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 16:23:34 +02:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 10:51:08 +02:00
x86/math-emu: Check __copy_from_user() result
The new __must_check annotation on __copy_from_user() successfully
identified some code that has lacked the check since at least
linux-2.1.73:
arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c:88:2: error: ignoring return value of \
function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Werror,-Wunused-result]
__copy_from_user(sti_ptr, s, 10);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c:1129:2: error: ignoring return value of \
function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Werror,-Wunused-result]
__copy_from_user(register_base + offset, s, other);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c:1131:3: error: ignoring return value of \
function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Werror,-Wunused-result]
__copy_from_user(register_base, s + other, offset);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In addition, the get_user()/put_user() helpers do not enforce a return
value check, but actually still require one. These have been missing for
even longer.
Change the internal wrappers around get_user()/put_user() to force
a signal and add a corresponding wrapper around __copy_from_user()
to check all such cases.
[ bp: Break long lines. ]
Fixes: 257e458057e5 ("Import 2.1.73")
Fixes: 9dd819a15162 ("uaccess: add missing __must_check attributes")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Bill Metzenthen <billm@...bpc.org.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191001142344.1274185-1-arnd@arndb.de
---
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h b/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h
index f98a0c9..9b41391 100644
--- a/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h
@@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ static inline bool seg_writable(struct desc_struct *d)
#define FPU_access_ok(y,z) if ( !access_ok(y,z) ) \
math_abort(FPU_info,SIGSEGV)
#define FPU_abort math_abort(FPU_info, SIGSEGV)
+#define FPU_copy_from_user(to, from, n) \
+ do { if (copy_from_user(to, from, n)) FPU_abort; } while (0)
#undef FPU_IGNORE_CODE_SEGV
#ifdef FPU_IGNORE_CODE_SEGV
@@ -122,7 +124,7 @@ static inline bool seg_writable(struct desc_struct *d)
#define FPU_code_access_ok(z) FPU_access_ok((void __user *)FPU_EIP,z)
#endif
-#define FPU_get_user(x,y) get_user((x),(y))
-#define FPU_put_user(x,y) put_user((x),(y))
+#define FPU_get_user(x,y) do { if (get_user((x),(y))) FPU_abort; } while (0)
+#define FPU_put_user(x,y) do { if (put_user((x),(y))) FPU_abort; } while (0)
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c b/arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c
index f377974..fe6246f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c
+++ b/arch/x86/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ int FPU_load_extended(long double __user *s, int stnr)
RE_ENTRANT_CHECK_OFF;
FPU_access_ok(s, 10);
- __copy_from_user(sti_ptr, s, 10);
+ FPU_copy_from_user(sti_ptr, s, 10);
RE_ENTRANT_CHECK_ON;
return FPU_tagof(sti_ptr);
@@ -1126,9 +1126,9 @@ void frstor(fpu_addr_modes addr_modes, u_char __user *data_address)
/* Copy all registers in stack order. */
RE_ENTRANT_CHECK_OFF;
FPU_access_ok(s, 80);
- __copy_from_user(register_base + offset, s, other);
+ FPU_copy_from_user(register_base + offset, s, other);
if (offset)
- __copy_from_user(register_base, s + other, offset);
+ FPU_copy_from_user(register_base, s + other, offset);
RE_ENTRANT_CHECK_ON;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists