[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191004091214.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 10:12:14 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
The etnaviv authors <etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:46:06AM -0700, Chris Healy wrote:
> >
> > The iMX6 does not have MMUv2 hardware, it has MMUv1. With MMUv1
> > hardware requires command buffers within the first 2GiB of physical
> > RAM.
> >
> I thought that the i.MX6q has the MMUv1 and GC2000 GPU while the
> i.MX6qp has the MMUv2 and GC3000? Meaning the i.MX6 has both MMUv1
> and MMUv2 depending on which i.MX6 part we are talking about.
The report says iMX6Q with GC2000 - which is what I was referring to
here. I'm not aware of what the later SoCs use, since I've never used
them.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists