[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191004101902.GA19685@mani>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:49:02 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
c.barrett@...mos.com, a.brela@...mos.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] media: i2c: Add IMX290 CMOS image sensor driver
Hi Sakari,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:23:36PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Manivannan,
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 03:25:03PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Add driver for Sony IMX290 CMOS image sensor driver. The driver only
> > supports I2C interface for programming and MIPI CSI-2 for sensor output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
>
> Could you remove the unneeded ret variable from imx290_power_on() and
> unneeded goto in the same function?
>
yep, sure.
> The MAINTAINERS entry belongs to the first patch adding new files.
>
You mean the bindings patch? If then, sorry no. Usually the devicetree bindings
belongs to a separate patch and that is what perferred by Rob. I prefer the
MAINTAINERS entry in a separate patch but I've seen subsystems maintainers
asking to squash it with the driver patch. But squashing it with bindings
patch seems weird to me.
Thanks,
Mani
> Then I think this is good.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists