[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1944905967.4863703.1570204154537.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 11:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
To: aliasgar surti500 <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
Cc: agruenba@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfs2: removed unnecessary semicolon
----- Original Message -----
> From: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
>
> There is use of unnecessary semicolon after switch case.
> Removed the semicolon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Surti <aliasgar.surti500@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/gfs2/recovery.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/recovery.c b/fs/gfs2/recovery.c
> index c529f8749a89..f4aa8551277b 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/recovery.c
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ void gfs2_recover_func(struct work_struct *work)
>
> default:
> goto fail;
> - };
> + }
>
> error = gfs2_glock_nq_init(ip->i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED,
> LM_FLAG_NOEXP | GL_NOCACHE, &ji_gh);
> --
> 2.17.1
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. I did a quick search and found two more:
glops.c- break;
glops.c: };
inode.c- goto out_gunlock;
inode.c: };
Do you want to include those in your patch and re-submit it or
should I cook up a second patch?
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
Powered by blists - more mailing lists