linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: sam9x60_wdt: introduce sam9x60 watchdog timer driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Oct 2019 05:36:38 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.or
Cc:     wim@...ux-watchdog.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: sam9x60_wdt: introduce sam9x60 watchdog
 timer driver

On 10/7/19 12:58 AM, Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com wrote:
[ ... ]
> Hello Guenter,
> 
> Thank you for the feedback.
> After reviewing this, can you please guide me towards one of the
> possible two directions: merge this driver with sama5d4_wdt , and have a
> single driver with support for both hardware blocks; or, have this
> driver separately , as in this patch series?
> 

I noticed the similarities. I don't know if it makes sense to reconcile
the two drivers; it seems to me the new chip uses the same basic core with
enhancements. In general, I prefer a single driver, but only if the result
doesn't end up being an if/else mess. Ultimately, it is really your call
to make.

Guenter