[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sgo3dasg.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:13:51 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mat King <mathewk@...gle.com>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Alexander Schremmer <alex@...xanderweb.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: New sysfs interface for privacy screens
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, Mat King <mathewk@...gle.com> wrote:
> That makes sense; just to confirm can a property be added or removed
> after the connector is registered?
You need to create the property before registering the drm device. You
can attach/detach the property later, but I should think you know by the
time you're registering the connector whether it supports the privacy
screen or not.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists