[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c66196346aa47d7a252a8c0dd67ae84@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:28:51 +0000
From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "adobriyan@...il.com" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"cyphar@...har.com" <cyphar@...har.com>,
"christian@...uner.io" <christian@...uner.io>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
"mm-commits@...r.kernel.org" <mm-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc:fix confusing macro arg name
On 2019/10/8 15:05, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2019/10/8 14:44, linmiaohe wrote:
>> state_size and ops are in the wrong position, fix it.
>>
>
> Good catch!
>
> This is interesting, I saw this interface has 50+ callers, How did they work before? ;)
>
This confused me too. The args of function proc_create_net_single is consistent with
the callers, so it works. But the wrong args name in macro proc_create_net makes
it confusing.
Thanks, have a nice day!
> Thanks,
> -Aubrey
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists