linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191008130234.GP2294@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:02:34 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:

> I thought we should always order local variable declarations from
> longest to shortest line but can't find this rule in coding-style.rst
> either.

You're right though, that is generally encouraged. From last years
(2018) KS there was the notion of a subsystem handbook and the tip
tree's submissions thereto can be found there:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181107171149.165693799@linutronix.de/

But for some raisin that never actually went anywhere...