[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008141642.GQ2294@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:16:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Yeah, right shift on signed negative values are implementation defined.
Seriously? Even under -fno-strict-overflow? There is a perfectly
sensible operation for signed shift right, this stuff should not be
undefined.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists