[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008151547.GA2864822@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:15:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vchiq: don't leak kernel address
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 05:25:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 3:16 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The subject doesn't match the patch. It should just be "remove useless
> > > printk".
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > dan carpenter
> > >
> >
> > Well, it avoids leaking an address by removing an useless printk.
> > It seems that GKH already picked the patch in his staging tree, but
> > I'm fine with both subjects, really,
>
> The address wasn't leaked because it was already %pK. The subject
> says there is an info leak security problem, when the opposite is true.
I've edited the subject line now.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists