linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add support for external display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191009022534.BD6C62070B@mail.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:25:33 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, robdclark@...il.com,
        sean@...rly.run
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, a.hajda@...sung.com,
        Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, jonathan@...ek.ca,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add support for external display

Quoting Brian Masney (2019-10-06 18:45:09)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
> index b607c9ff9e12..380a805cd1f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts
> @@ -371,6 +401,40 @@
>                                 function = "gpio";
>                         };
>                 };
> +
> +               hdmi_pin: hdmi {
> +                       cec {
> +                               pins = "gpio31";
> +                               function = "hdmi_cec";
> +                       };
> +
> +                       ddc {
> +                               pins = "gpio32", "gpio33";
> +                               function = "hdmi_ddc";
> +                       };
> +
> +                       hpd {
> +                               pins = "gpio34";
> +                               function = "hdmi_hpd";
> +                       };
> +               };
> +
> +               anx_msm_pin: anx {
> +                       irq {
> +                               pins = "gpio28";
> +                               function = "gpio";

Is function = "gpio" necessary anymore? I thought we would turn gpios
into gpio function when it's requested as a gpio by some consumer.

> +                               drive-strength = <8>;
> +                               bias-pull-up;
> +                               input-enable;
> +                       };
> +
> +                       reset {
> +                               pins = "gpio68";
> +                               function = "gpio";
> +                               drive-strength = <8>;
> +                               bias-pull-up;
> +                       };
> +               };
>         };
>  
>         vibrator@...c3450 {