[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeuQ0O9SxveRXqOKoRKQQJNwJ_1WX6taNfgWebiP0KdJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:48:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@...l.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: pciehp: Wait for PDS if in-band presence is disabled
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:37 PM Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the feedback! An infinite loop is used several other places in
> > this driver--this keeps the style similar. I can change it as you suggest,
> > though, if that would be preferable to consistency.
>
> Better to start the change now. I'll look into the file and see how we
> can improve the rest.
I found only one infinite loop there, the other timeout loop is done
as do {} while.
I'll send a patch to refactor the infinite one.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists