[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VesLq28L3rWfAciyU5kQjXSfuKRtnoKciuj+wZ_ogb0TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:05:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@...l.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: pciehp: Wait for PDS if in-band presence is disabled
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:48 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:37 PM Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for the feedback! An infinite loop is used several other places in
> > > this driver--this keeps the style similar. I can change it as you suggest,
> > > though, if that would be preferable to consistency.
> >
> > Better to start the change now. I'll look into the file and see how we
> > can improve the rest.
>
> I found only one infinite loop there, the other timeout loop is done
> as do {} while.
> I'll send a patch to refactor the infinite one.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20191011090230.81080-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/#u
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists