[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191011133120.GP16384@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:31:20 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] firmware: add offset to request_firmware_into_buf
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:24:22 +0200,
> Scott Branden wrote:
> >
> > I will admit I am not familiar with every subtlety of PCI
> > accesses. Any comments to the Valkyrie driver in this patch series are
> > appreciated.
> > But not all drivers need to work on all architectures. I can add a
> > depends on x86 64bit architectures to the driver to limit it to such.
>
> But it's an individual board on PCIe, and should work no matter which
> architecture is? Or is this really exclusive to x86?
Poke Scott.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists