linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191011093319.3ef302ff@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:33:19 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jeyu@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/ftrace: Use text_poke()

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:59:03 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 07:28:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Really the best solution is to move all the poking into
> > ftrace_module_init(), before we mark it RO+X. That's what I'm going to
> > do for jump_label and static_call as well, I just need to add that extra
> > notifier callback.  
> 
> OK, so I started writing that patch... or rather, I wrote the patch and
> started on the Changelog when I ran into trouble describing why we need
> it.
> 
> That is, I'm struggling to explain why we cannot flip
> prepare_coming_module() and complete_formation().
> 
> Yes, it breaks ftrace, but I'm thinking that is all it breaks. So let me
> see if we can cure that.

For someone that doesn't use modules, you are making me very nervous
with all the changes you are making to the module code! ;-)

-- Steve