linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:33:46 +0100
From:   Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To:     Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
        Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing
 PSTATE

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:31:02AM -0400, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/10/19 2:44 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >  #define PSR_IL_BIT		(1 << 20)
> > -#define PSR_BTYPE_CALL		(2 << PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT)
> > +
> > +/* Convenience names for the values of PSTATE.BTYPE */
> > +#define PSR_BTYPE_NONE		(0b00 << PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PSR_BTYPE_JC		(0b01 << PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PSR_BTYPE_C		(0b10 << PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT)
> > +#define PSR_BTYPE_J		(0b11 << PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT)
> 
> It'd be nice to sort this patch earlier, so that ...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> > index 4a3bd32..452ac5b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> >  
> >  	if (system_supports_bti()) {
> >  		regs->pstate &= ~PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
> > -		regs->pstate |= PSR_BTYPE_CALL;
> > +		regs->pstate |= PSR_BTYPE_C;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> 
> ... setup_return does not need to be adjusted a second time.
> 
> I don't see any other conflicts vs patch 5.

Ack, looks like I mis-split this during rebase.

Will fix.

Cheers
---Dave