linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: adc: max1027: Add debugfs register read support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191012145621.228d4efc@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:56:21 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: adc: max1027: Add debugfs register read
 support

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 12:00:01 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote on Sun, 6 Oct 2019 11:04:24
> +0100:
> 
> > On Thu,  3 Oct 2019 19:33:55 +0200
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Until now, only write operations were supported. Force two bytes read
> > > operation when reading from this register (might be wrong when reading
> > > the temperature, but will work with any other value).    
> > 
> > That's worrying as comments go.  Just return an error on the temperature
> > register if it's going to do the wrong thing.  
> 
> Actually the debugfs_reg_access hook is supposedly stateless. When
> reading registers I don't know what I am reading because the "source" is
> selected during the write operation, so I have no reliable way to know
> what I am reading.
> 
> I set the read length to 2 bytes because most of the "atomic"reads are
> two bytes and it allows us to test various commands directly from
> userspace and read meaningful values. This is a limitation as:
> * Voltage 'atomic' reads are 2 bytes
> * Temperature 'atomic' reads are 2 bytes but never come alone (usually
>   one voltage input of 2B will follow).
> * Any other 'condensed' input will be more than 2 bytes, ie. several
>   voltage values in one go.
> 
> In any case, doing a software reset of the chip will turn it back
> into a working state no matter what was requested/read.
> 
> For me, 2-byte reads is a "good enough" solution that will work with
> almost all the simplest ('atomic') SPI operations, but if you think
> limiting to 2-bytes access is a problem (right now there is only write
> access, which is kind of useless on its own) then let's drop the patch.
> But I wanted to contribute it because it really helped me during the
> development. 

This is fine as is.  Comment was worrying so could perhaps have given
more detail.  Still it's a debug interface, people get to look at the
datasheet if they are using this :)

Jonathan


> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl