lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb1f904a-a2e4-fe9b-c50e-b8087d7e57c4@web.de>
Date:   Sat, 12 Oct 2019 19:03:09 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Yang Wei <yang.wei9@....com.cn>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
        Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>
Subject: net: tulip: de2104x: Checking a kmemdup() call in
 de21041_get_srom_info()

Hello,

I tried another script for the semantic patch language out.
This source code analysis approach points out that the implementation
of the function “de21041_get_srom_info” contains still an unchecked call
of the function “kmemdup”.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c?id=1c0cc5f1ae5ee5a6913704c0d75a6e99604ee30a#n1940
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4-rc2/source/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c#L1940

How do you think about to improve it?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ