| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87o8yl587f.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:02:44 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
sashal@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, sstabellini@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/kvm: Add "nopvspin" parameter to disable PV spinlocks
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com> writes:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" on XEN platform and
> "hv_nopvspin" on HYPER_V).
>
> That feature is missed on KVM, add a new parameter "nopvspin" to disable
> PV spinlocks for KVM guest.
>
> The new 'nopvspin' parameter will also replace Xen and Hyper-V specific
> parameters in future patches.
>
> Define variable nopvsin as global because it will be used in future
> patches as above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index c7ac2f3..89d77ea 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5330,6 +5330,11 @@
> as generic guest with no PV drivers. Currently support
> XEN HVM, KVM, HYPER_V and VMWARE guest.
>
> + nopvspin [X86,KVM]
> + Disables the qspinlock slow path using PV optimizations
> + which allow the hypervisor to 'idle' the guest on lock
> + contention.
> +
> xirc2ps_cs= [NET,PCMCIA]
> Format:
> <irq>,<irq_mask>,<io>,<full_duplex>,<do_sound>,<lockup_hack>[,<irq2>[,<irq3>[,<irq4>]]]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> index 444d6fd..d86ab94 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(struct qspinlock *lo
> extern void __pv_init_lock_hash(void);
> extern void __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
> extern void __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock);
> +extern bool nopvspin;
>
> #define queued_spin_unlock queued_spin_unlock
> /**
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index ef836d6..6e14bd4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -825,18 +825,31 @@ __visible bool __kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
> */
> void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
> {
> - /* Does host kernel support KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT? */
> - if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT))
> + /*
> + * Disable PV qspinlocks if host kernel doesn't support
> + * KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT feature or there is only 1 vCPU.
> + * virt_spin_lock_key is enabled to avoid lock holder
> + * preemption issue.
> + */
> + if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT) ||
> + num_possible_cpus() == 1) {
> + pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled\n");
Why don't we need static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key) here?
Also, as you're printing the exact reason for PV spinlocks disablement
in other cases, I'd suggest separating "no host support" and "single
CPU" cases.
> return;
> + }
>
> if (kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME)) {
> + pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled with KVM_HINTS_REALTIME hints.\n");
> static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
> return;
> }
>
> - /* Don't use the pvqspinlock code if there is only 1 vCPU. */
> - if (num_possible_cpus() == 1)
> + if (nopvspin) {
> + pr_info("PV spinlocks disabled forced by \"nopvspin\" parameter.\n");
Nit: to make it sound better a comma is missing between 'disabled' and
'forced', or
"PV spinlocks forcefully disabled by ..." if you prefer.
> + static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
> return;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("PV spinlocks enabled\n");
>
> __pv_init_lock_hash();
> pv_ops.lock.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath;
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> index 2473f10..75193d6 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -580,4 +580,11 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
> #include "qspinlock_paravirt.h"
> #include "qspinlock.c"
>
> +bool nopvspin __initdata;
> +static __init int parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
> +{
> + nopvspin = true;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("nopvspin", parse_nopvspin);
> #endif
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists