linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add a unified parameter "nopvspin"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d04aacc3-c816-94a6-052f-bf306ec23941@oracle.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:40:11 +0800
From:   Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     vkuznets@...hat.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
        sthemmin@...rosoft.com, sashal@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        rkrcmar@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
        sstabellini@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add a unified parameter "nopvspin"

The last two patches are reviewed, will any KVM expert be willing to 
review the first three patches?

They are all KVM related changes. Thanks

Zhenzhong

On 2019/10/7 17:04, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> There are cases folks want to disable spinlock optimization for
> debug/test purpose. Xen and hyperv already have parameters "xen_nopvspin"
> and "hv_nopvspin" to support that, but kvm doesn't.
>
> The first patch adds that feature to KVM guest with "nopvspin".
>
> For compatibility reason original parameters "xen_nopvspin" and
> "hv_nopvspin" are retained and marked obsolete.
>
> v5:
> PATCH1: new patch to revert a currently unnecessory commit,
>          code is simpler a bit after that change.         [Boris Ostrovsky]
> PATCH3: fold 'if' statement,add comments on virt_spin_lock_key,
>          reorder with PATCH2 to better reflect dependency
> PATCH4: fold 'if' statement, add Reviewed-by             [Boris Ostrovsky]
> PATCH5: add Reviewed-by                                  [Michael Kelley]
>
> v4:
> PATCH1: use variable name nopvspin instead of pvspin and
>          defined it as __initdata, changed print message,
>          updated patch description                     [Sean Christopherson]
> PATCH2: remove Suggested-by, use "kvm-guest:" prefix  [Sean Christopherson]
> PATCH3: make variable nopvsin and xen_pvspin coexist
>          remove Reviewed-by due to code change         [Sean Christopherson]
> PATCH4: make variable nopvsin and hv_pvspin coexist   [Sean Christopherson]
>
> v3:
> PATCH2: Fix indentation
>
> v2:
> PATCH1: pick the print code change into separate PATCH2,
>          updated patch description             [Vitaly Kuznetsov]
> PATCH2: new patch with print code change      [Vitaly Kuznetsov]
> PATCH3: add Reviewed-by                       [Juergen Gross]
>
> Zhenzhong Duan (5):
>    Revert "KVM: X86: Fix setup the virt_spin_lock_key before static key
>      get initialized"
>    x86/kvm: Change print code to use pr_*() format
>    x86/kvm: Add "nopvspin" parameter to disable PV spinlocks
>    xen: Mark "xen_nopvspin" parameter obsolete
>    x86/hyperv: Mark "hv_nopvspin" parameter obsolete
>
>   Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 14 +++++-
>   arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c                   |  4 ++
>   arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h                |  1 +
>   arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c                           | 63 ++++++++++++++-----------
>   arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c                         |  4 +-
>   kernel/locking/qspinlock.c                      |  7 +++
>   6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>