[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191013120937.GK5653@amd>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:09:37 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...com>, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmurphy@...com, tomi.valkeinen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] leds: Add control of the voltage/current
regulator to the LED core
Hi!
> I must say I'm not a big fan of this change.
> It adds a bunch of code to the LED core and gives small
> functionality in a reward. It may also influence maximum
> software blinking rate, so I'd rather avoid calling
> regulator_enable/disable when timer trigger is set.
>
> It will of course require more code.
>
> Since AFAIR Pavel was original proponent of this change then
> I'd like to see his opinion before we move on to discussing
> possible improvements to this patch.
Was I?
Okay, this series looks quite confusing to me. First, 1/3 looks
"interesting" (would have to analyze it way more).
Second, 3/3... So we have a LED driver _and_ a regulator? So yes, the
chip driving a LED is usually ... voltage/current regulator. What is
second regulator doing there? Is that a common setup?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists