[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1b53ef537203e629328285b4597a09e4a586d688.1571181041.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:43:16 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] of-thermal: Disable polling when interrupt property is found in DT
Currently, in order to enable interrupt-only mode, one must set
polling-delay-passive and polling-delay properties in the DT to 0,
otherwise the thermal framework will continue to setup a periodic timers
to monitor the thermal zones.
Change the behaviour, so that on DT-based systems, we no longer have to
set the properties to zero if we find an 'interrupt' property in the
sensor.
Following data shows the number of times
thermal_zone_device_set_polling() is invoked with and without this
patch. So the patch achieves the same behaviour as setting the delay
properties to 0.
Current behaviour (without setting delay properties to 0):
FUNC COUNT
thermal_zone_device_update 302
thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 7911
Current behaviour (with delay properties set to 0):
FUNC COUNT
thermal_zone_device_update 3
thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 6
With this patch (without setting delay properties to 0):
FUNC COUNT
thermal_zone_device_update 3
thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 6
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
---
drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
index dc5093be553e..79ad587462b1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
@@ -412,7 +412,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops of_thermal_ops = {
static struct thermal_zone_device *
thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone,
struct device_node *sensor, void *data,
- const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops *ops)
+ const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops *ops,
+ bool force_interrupts)
{
struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
struct __thermal_zone *tz;
@@ -433,6 +434,11 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone,
tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp;
tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend;
+ if (force_interrupts) {
+ tz->passive_delay = 0;
+ tz->polling_delay = 0;
+ }
+
/*
* The thermal zone core will calculate the window if they have set the
* optional set_trips pointer.
@@ -486,6 +492,7 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, void *data,
{
struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np;
struct thermal_zone_device *tzd = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ bool force_interrupts = false;
np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
if (!np)
@@ -498,6 +505,9 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, void *data,
sensor_np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
+ if (of_find_property(sensor_np, "interrupts", NULL))
+ force_interrupts = true;
+
for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
int ret, id;
@@ -520,7 +530,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id, void *data,
if (sensor_specs.np == sensor_np && id == sensor_id) {
tzd = thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child, sensor_np,
- data, ops);
+ data, ops,
+ force_interrupts);
if (!IS_ERR(tzd))
tzd->ops->set_mode(tzd, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists