[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5da6a33b.1c69fb81.64cc.6834@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:57:30 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of-thermal: Disable polling when interrupt property is found in DT
Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-10-15 16:13:16)
> Currently, in order to enable interrupt-only mode, one must set
> polling-delay-passive and polling-delay properties in the DT to 0,
> otherwise the thermal framework will continue to setup a periodic timers
> to monitor the thermal zones.
>
> Change the behaviour, so that on DT-based systems, we no longer have to
> set the properties to zero if we find an 'interrupt' property in the
> sensor.
>
> Following data shows the number of times
> thermal_zone_device_set_polling() is invoked with and without this
> patch. So the patch achieves the same behaviour as setting the delay
> properties to 0.
>
> Current behaviour (without setting delay properties to 0):
> FUNC COUNT
> thermal_zone_device_update 302
> thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 7911
thermal_zone_device_set_polling?
>
> Current behaviour (with delay properties set to 0):
> FUNC COUNT
> thermal_zone_device_update 3
> thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 6
>
> With this patch (without setting delay properties to 0):
> FUNC COUNT
> thermal_zone_device_update 3
> thermal_zone_device_set_pollin 6
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists