linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Don't set SD_BALANCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86fd060d-fc2f-b9e8-ec14-b4f4627f7c0c@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:37:11 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, qperret@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Don't set SD_BALANCE_WAKE on cpuset
 domain relax

On 15/10/2019 12:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This 'relax' thing is on my list of regrets. It is a terrible thing that
> should never have existed.
> 
> Are you actually using it or did you just stumble upon it while looking
> around there?
> 

Just staring around, I don't use cpuset stuff unless I really need to...