linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Don't set SD_BALANCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:28:49 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, qperret@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Don't set SD_BALANCE_WAKE on cpuset
 domain relax

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 15/10/2019 12:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > This 'relax' thing is on my list of regrets. It is a terrible thing that
> > should never have existed.
> > 
> > Are you actually using it or did you just stumble upon it while looking
> > around there?
> > 
> 
> Just staring around, I don't use cpuset stuff unless I really need to...

Fair enough. Applied it.