lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUBdhSVqpT4grtdKyHxoVEfJcoiTrVzau_kVeFoUw8zvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:57:10 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: use patch subject when reading from stdin

Hi Joe,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:24 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 18:40 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The advantage of formail over git-mailsplit is that the former doesn't
> > create a bunch of files that need to be stored in a temporary place,
> > and cleant up afterwards.
> > But hey, that can be handled in yet-another-script...
>
> Or yet-another-git-hook.

Too late: thou maintainer shall run checkpatch before  applying patches.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ