[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f8fa7fb-dd1d-c26d-7756-a525aa46cf71@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:31:47 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
moderated for non-subscribers <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 17 (soundwire)
On 10/17/19 10:22 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/16/19 9:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20191016:
>>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> # CONFIG_BLOCK is not set
>
> CC [M] drivers/soundwire/intel_init.o
> In file included from ../drivers/soundwire/intel_init.c:12:0:
> ../include/linux/iomap.h: In function ‘iomap_sector’:
> ../include/linux/iomap.h:76:48: error: ‘SECTOR_SHIFT’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SECTIONS_SHIFT’?
> return (iomap->addr + pos - iomap->offset) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> SECTIONS_SHIFT
Yes, looks like by fixing cross-compilation issues I added new ones.
We can either add an explicit dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK or remove the
use of ioread32() and use readl() instead. I didn't write the initial
code and I have no idea what the intent behind using ioread32 was.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists