linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: sdhci-of-at91: new compatible string and update properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:15:23 +0200
From:   Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: sdhci-of-at91: new compatible string
 and update properties

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 12:33, Ludovic Desroches
> <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is a new compatible string for the SAM9X60 sdhci device. It involves
> > an update of the properties about the clocks stuff.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
> 
> This doesn't apply any more, can you please re-spin it?

Sure, I'll rebase these patches and send a v2

Regards

Ludovic

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 
> 
> > ---
> >
> > Changes:
> > - v2: remove the extra example and fix node label
> >
> > This patch conflicts with Nicolas' one: "dt-bindings: sdhci-of-at91: add
> > the microchip,sdcal-inverted property". Let me know which one has to be
> > rebased or you can handle it.
> >
> > Ludovic
> >
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt       | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > index 1b662d7171a0..5d541ad4d4eb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-atmel.txt
> > @@ -5,17 +5,26 @@ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt and the properties used by the
> >  sdhci-of-at91 driver.
> >
> >  Required properties:
> > -- compatible:          Must be "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci".
> > +- compatible:          Must be "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci" or "microchip,sam9x60-sdhci".
> >  - clocks:              Phandlers to the clocks.
> > -- clock-names:         Must be "hclock", "multclk", "baseclk";
> > +- clock-names:         Must be "hclock", "multclk", "baseclk" for
> > +                       "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci".
> > +                       Must be "hclock", "multclk" for "microchip,sam9x60-sdhci".
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- assigned-clocks:     The same with "multclk".
> > +- assigned-clock-rates The rate of "multclk" in order to not rely on the
> > +                       gck configuration set by previous components.
> >
> >
> >  Example:
> >
> > -sdmmc0: sdio-host@...00000 {
> > +mmc0: sdio-host@...00000 {
> >         compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-sdhci";
> >         reg = <0xa0000000 0x300>;
> >         interrupts = <31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> >         clocks = <&sdmmc0_hclk>, <&sdmmc0_gclk>, <&main>;
> >         clock-names = "hclock", "multclk", "baseclk";
> > +       assigned-clocks = <&sdmmc0_gclk>;
> > +       assigned-clock-rates = <480000000>;
> >  };
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >