linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] KVM: VMX: Pass through CET related MSRs to Guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:31:06 +0800
From:   Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] KVM: VMX: Pass through CET related MSRs to Guest

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:04:11PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:15:09PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > > > +       kvm_xss = kvm_supported_xss();
> > > > +       cet_en = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> > > > +                guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT);
> > > > +       /*
> > > > +        * U_CET is a must for USER CET, per CET spec., U_CET and PL3_SPP are
> > > > +        * a bundle for USER CET xsaves.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (cet_en && (kvm_xss & XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER)) {
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_U_CET, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +       }
> > > 
> > > Since this is called from vmx_cpuid_update, what happens if cet_en was
> > > previously true and now it's false?
> > > 
> > Yes, it's likely, but guest CPUID usually is fixed before
> > guest is launched, do you have any suggestion?
> 
> Re-enable interception.  kvm_x86_ops->cpuid_update() is only called in
> the ioctl flow, i.e. it's not performance critical.
>
OK, will add a *else* clause to re-intercept the MSRs as Jim suggested.

> > > > +       /*
> > > > +        * S_CET is a must for KERNEL CET, PL0_SSP ... PL2_SSP are a bundle
> > > > +        * for CET KERNEL xsaves.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +       if (cet_en && (kvm_xss & XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL)) {
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_S_CET, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +               vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +
> > > > +               /* SSP_TAB only available for KERNEL SHSTK.*/
> > > > +               if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> > > > +                       vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB,
> > > > +                                                     MSR_TYPE_RW);
> > > > +       }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > >  {
> > > >         struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > > > @@ -7025,6 +7062,8 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > >         if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT) &&
> > > >                         guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT))
> > > >                 update_intel_pt_cfg(vcpu);
> > > > +
> > > > +       vmx_intercept_cet_msrs(vcpu);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static void vmx_set_supported_cpuid(u32 func, struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.2
> > > >