linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: x86: Add user-space access interface for CET MSRs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191018013211.GC2286@local-michael-cet-test>
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:32:11 +0800
From:   Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: x86: Add user-space access interface for CET
 MSRs

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:58:11PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:57:50PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:17 PM Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There're two different places storing Guest CET states, the states
> > > managed with XSAVES/XRSTORS, as restored/saved
> > > in previous patch, can be read/write directly from/to the MSRs.
> > > For those stored in VMCS fields, they're access via vmcs_read/
> > > vmcs_write.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > index 44913e4ab558..5265db7cd2af 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > @@ -1671,6 +1671,49 @@ static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static int check_cet_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > 
> > I'd suggest changing return type to bool, since you are essentially
> > returning true or false.
> 
> I'd also be more explicit in the name, e.g. is_valid_cet_msr().
Sure, thank you two.