linux-kernel - Re: email as a bona fide git transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191018013029.GA1167832@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 18:30:29 -0700
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Santiago Torres Arias <santiago@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
Subject: Re: email as a bona fide git transport

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 04:45:32PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:43:43PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I wonder if it'd be also possible to then embed gpg signatures over
> > > send-mail payloads so as they can be transparently transferred to the
> > > commit.
> > 
> > That's a crazy idea.  It would be nice if we could do that, I like it :)
> 
> It could only possibly work if nobody ever adds their own "Signed-Off-By" or
> any other bylines. I expect this is a deal-breaker for most maintainers.

Yeah it is :(

But, if we could just have the signature on the code change, not the
changelog text, that would help with that issue.

thanks,

rgeg k-h