lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 21:54:47 -0400
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Santiago Torres Arias <santiago@....edu>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        workflows@...r.kernel.org, Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
Subject: Re: email as a bona fide git transport

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 06:30:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> It could only possibly work if nobody ever adds their own 
>> "Signed-Off-By" or
>> any other bylines. I expect this is a deal-breaker for most maintainers.
>
>Yeah it is :(
>
>But, if we could just have the signature on the code change, not the
>changelog text, that would help with that issue.

We totally should, and I even mused on how we would do that here:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20190910121324.GA6867@pure.paranoia.local/

However, since git's PGP signatures are made for the content in the 
actual commit record (tree hash, parent, author, commit message, etc), 
the only way we could preserve them between the email and the git tree 
is if we never modify any of that data. The SOB and other trailers would 
have to only be applied to the merge commit, or migrate into commit 
notes.

-K

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ