linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMpxmJVEXubtBhQs5wH00wvK=yp8nr0cZ04x9t8eCTLVU=O1JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:29:49 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource: remove
 useless script

sob., 19 paź 2019 o 14:09 Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> napisał(a):
>
> On 19/10/2019 11:00:47+0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > While it is useful for new drivers to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource,
> >
> > This is nice.
> >
> >
> > > this script is currently used to spam maintainers,
> >
> > This view is unfortunate.
> >
> > Do we stumble on a target conflict again?
> >
> >
> > > often updating very old drivers.
> >
> > This can also happen.
> >
> >
> > > The net benefit is the removal of 2 lines of code in the driver
> >
> > Additional effects can be reconsidered, can't they?
> >
>
> What are the additional effects? What is the end goal of converting all
> the existing drivers to devm_platform_ioremap_resource? The existing
> code is currently always correct and it is difficult to see how this
> would lead to any bug avoidance in the long term.
>
> > > but the review load for the maintainers is huge.
> >
> > Does collateral evolution trigger a remarkable amount of changes occasionally?
> >
>
> This is not an evolution, it is unnecessary churn. Those patches have no
> benefit and eat up very valuable reviewer time.
>
> >
> > How will such feedback influence the development and integration of
> > further scripts for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software)?
> >
>
> There are a few other scripts that have no added value when applied to
> existing code, like ptr_ret.cocci.
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Hi Alexandre,

Markus has been black-listed by several core maintainers already, I
think you're wasting your time arguing. WRT the patch: when
introducing this wrapper, I definitely didn't expect people to send
hundreds of often wrong patches based on coccinelle reports, so I
guess removing the script is correct.

Bart