| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFD6DHg7J68jHSmNEft7czS+w9pqO8FnjB0a4Ubr5jAUh8Tmdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:41:40 +0530
From: Sheetal Tigadoli <sheetal.tigadoli@...adcom.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>,
Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] firmware: broadcom: add OP-TEE based BNXT f/w manager
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for your comments.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:46 AM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:31:20 +0530, Sheetal Tigadoli wrote:
> > From: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>
> >
> > This driver registers on TEE bus to interact with OP-TEE based
> > BNXT firmware management modules
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sheetal Tigadoli <sheetal.tigadoli@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/broadcom/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/firmware/broadcom/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h | 14 ++
> > 4 files changed, 306 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Kconfig
> > index d03ed8e..79505ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Kconfig
> > @@ -22,3 +22,11 @@ config BCM47XX_SPROM
> > In case of SoC devices SPROM content is stored on a flash used by
> > bootloader firmware CFE. This driver provides method to ssb and bcma
> > drivers to read SPROM on SoC.
> > +
> > +config TEE_BNXT_FW
> > + bool "Broadcom BNXT firmware manager"
> > + depends on (ARCH_BCM_IPROC && OPTEE) || COMPILE_TEST
> > + default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
> > + help
> > + This module help to manage firmware on Broadcom BNXT device. The module
> > + registers on tee bus and invoke calls to manage firmware on BNXT device.
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Makefile
> > index 72c7fdc..17c5061 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/Makefile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BCM47XX_NVRAM) += bcm47xx_nvram.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_BCM47XX_SPROM) += bcm47xx_sprom.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_TEE_BNXT_FW) += tee_bnxt_fw.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..1e1e54c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2019 Broadcom.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
> > +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h>
> > +
> > +#define MAX_SHM_MEM_SZ SZ_4M
> > +
> > +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMB 4
> > +
> > +#define HANDLE_ERROR(ret, tee_ret, cmd) \
> > +do { \
> > + if ((ret < 0) || (tee_ret != 0)) { \
>
> The parenthesis should be around macro parameters.
>
> if ((ret) < 0 || (tee_ret) != 0) {
>
> || has low priority
>
> > + dev_err(pvt_data.dev, \
> > + #cmd " invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n", \
> > + tee_ret, ret); \
> > + return -EINVAL; \
>
> macros shouldn't change control flow, return statements in macros are
> bad
Will remove the macro HANDLE_ERROR
>
> > + } \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > +enum ta_cmd {
> > + /*
> > + * TA_CMD_BNXT_FASTBOOT - boot bnxt device by copying f/w into sram
> > + *
> > + * param[0] unused
> > + * param[1] unused
> > + * param[2] unused
> > + * param[3] unused
> > + *
> > + * Result:
> > + * TEE_SUCCESS - Invoke command success
> > + * TEE_ERROR_ITEM_NOT_FOUND - Corrupt f/w image found on memory
> > + */
> > + TA_CMD_BNXT_FASTBOOT = 0,
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TA_CMD_BNXT_COPY_COREDUMP - copy the core dump into shm
> > + *
> > + * param[0] (in value) - value.a: offset, data to be copied from
> > + * value.b: size of the data
> > + * param[1] unused
> > + * param[2] unused
> > + * param[3] unused
> > + *
> > + * Result:
> > + * TEE_SUCCESS - Invoke command success
> > + * TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS - Incorrect input param
> > + * TEE_ERROR_ITEM_NOT_FOUND - Corrupt core dump
> > + */
> > + TA_CMD_BNXT_COPY_COREDUMP = 3,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct tee_bnxt_fw_private - OP-TEE bnxt private data
> > + * @dev: OP-TEE based bnxt device.
> > + * @ctx: OP-TEE context handler.
> > + * @session_id: TA session identifier.
> > + */
> > +struct tee_bnxt_fw_private {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct tee_context *ctx;
> > + u32 session_id;
> > + struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct tee_bnxt_fw_private pvt_data;
> > +
> > +static inline void prepare_args(int cmd,
>
> No static inlines in .c files, please, the compiler will know what to
> inline.
Will change this to static function.
>
> > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *inv_arg,
>
> inv usually means invalid, please rename to arg
Ok.
>
> > + struct tee_param *param)
> > +{
> > + memset(inv_arg, 0, sizeof(*inv_arg));
> > + memset(param, 0, (MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMB * sizeof(*param)));
>
> array_size(), outer parens unnecessary
Ok.
>
> > +
> > + inv_arg->func = cmd;
> > + inv_arg->session = pvt_data.session_id;
> > + inv_arg->num_params = MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMB;
> > +
> > + /* Fill invoke cmd params */
> > + switch (cmd) {
> > + case TA_CMD_BNXT_COPY_COREDUMP:
> > + param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT;
> > + param[0].u.memref.shm = pvt_data.fw_shm_pool;
> > + param[0].u.memref.size = MAX_SHM_MEM_SZ;
> > + param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> > + param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
> > + break;
> > + case TA_CMD_BNXT_FASTBOOT:
> > + default:
> > + /* Nothing to do */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tee_bnxt_fw_load() - Load the bnxt firmware
> > + * Uses an OP-TEE call to start a secure
> > + * boot process.
> > + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno otherwise.
> > + */
> > +int tee_bnxt_fw_load(void)
>
> This is a little strange. This function takes no parameters, so how
> does this thing know where to load the firmware? Is it not possible
> to have two devices that'd both require FW?
This function invokes command to optee pta, which is aware of where to load
the firmware and we don't have multiple devices
>
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg inv_arg;
> > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMB];
> > +
> > + if (!pvt_data.ctx)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + prepare_args(TA_CMD_BNXT_FASTBOOT, &inv_arg, param);
> > +
> > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(pvt_data.ctx, &inv_arg, param);
> > + HANDLE_ERROR(ret, inv_arg.ret, TA_CMD_BNXT_FASTBOOT);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tee_bnxt_fw_load);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tee_bnxt_copy_coredump() - Copy coredump from the allocated memory
> > + * Uses an OP-TEE call to copy coredump
> > + * @buf: desintation buffer where core dump is copied into
> > + * @offset: offset from the base address of core dump area
> > + * @size: size of the dump
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno otherwise.
> > + */
> > +int tee_bnxt_copy_coredump(void *buf, u32 offset, u32 size)
> > +{
> > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg inv_arg;
> > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMB];
> > + void *core_data;
> > + u32 rbytes = size;
> > + u32 nbytes = 0;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!pvt_data.ctx)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + if (!buf)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Generally we don't check args like that in the kernel, callers should
> not be broken.
Ok. will remove
>
> > + prepare_args(TA_CMD_BNXT_COPY_COREDUMP, &inv_arg, param);
> > +
> > + while (rbytes) {
> > + nbytes = rbytes;
> > +
> > + nbytes = min_t(u32, rbytes, param[0].u.memref.size);
> > +
> > + /* Fill additional invoke cmd params */
> > + param[1].u.value.a = offset;
> > + param[1].u.value.b = nbytes;
>
> But the doc above says param 1 is unused
will update the doc/enum description
>
> > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(pvt_data.ctx, &inv_arg, param);
> > + HANDLE_ERROR(ret, inv_arg.ret, TA_CMD_BNXT_COPY_COREDUMP);
> > +
> > + core_data = tee_shm_get_va(pvt_data.fw_shm_pool, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(core_data)) {
> > + dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "tee_shm_get_va failed\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(core_data);
> > + }
> > +
> > + memcpy(buf, core_data, nbytes);
> > +
> > + rbytes -= nbytes;
> > + buf += nbytes;
> > + offset += nbytes;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tee_bnxt_copy_coredump);
> > +
> > +static int optee_ctx_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> > +{
> > + if (ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_OPTEE)
> > + return 1;
> > + else
> > + return 0;
>
> Also known as return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_OPTEE; ...
Ok.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int tee_bnxt_fw_probe(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct tee_client_device *bnxt_device = to_tee_client_device(dev);
> > + int ret, err = -ENODEV;
> > + struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg;
> > + struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
> > +
> > + memset(&sess_arg, 0, sizeof(sess_arg));
> > +
> > + /* Open context with TEE driver */
> > + pvt_data.ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, optee_ctx_match, NULL,
> > + NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pvt_data.ctx))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + /* Open session with Bnxt load Trusted App */
> > + memcpy(sess_arg.uuid, bnxt_device->id.uuid.b, TEE_IOCTL_UUID_LEN);
> > + sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
> > + sess_arg.num_params = 0;
> > +
> > + ret = tee_client_open_session(pvt_data.ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
> > + if ((ret < 0) || (sess_arg.ret != 0)) {
>
> parens unnecessary
Will remove parens
>
> > + dev_err(dev, "tee_client_open_session failed, err: %x\n",
> > + sess_arg.ret);
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_ctx;
> > + }
> > + pvt_data.session_id = sess_arg.session;
> > +
> > + pvt_data.dev = dev;
> > +
> > + fw_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc(pvt_data.ctx, MAX_SHM_MEM_SZ,
> > + TEE_SHM_MAPPED | TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF);
> > + if (IS_ERR(fw_shm_pool)) {
> > + tee_client_close_context(pvt_data.ctx);
> > + dev_err(pvt_data.dev, "tee_shm_alloc failed\n");
> > + err = PTR_ERR(fw_shm_pool);
> > + goto out_sess;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pvt_data.fw_shm_pool = fw_shm_pool;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +out_sess:
> > + tee_client_close_session(pvt_data.ctx, pvt_data.session_id);
> > +out_ctx:
> > + tee_client_close_context(pvt_data.ctx);
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int tee_bnxt_fw_remove(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + tee_client_close_session(pvt_data.ctx, pvt_data.session_id);
> > + tee_client_close_context(pvt_data.ctx);
> > + pvt_data.ctx = NULL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct tee_client_device_id tee_bnxt_fw_id_table[] = {
> > + {UUID_INIT(0x6272636D, 0x2019, 0x0716,
> > + 0x42, 0x43, 0x4D, 0x5F, 0x53, 0x43, 0x48, 0x49)},
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(tee, tee_bnxt_fw_id_table);
> > +
> > +static struct tee_client_driver tee_bnxt_fw_driver = {
> > + .id_table = tee_bnxt_fw_id_table,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> > + .bus = &tee_bus_type,
> > + .probe = tee_bnxt_fw_probe,
> > + .remove = tee_bnxt_fw_remove,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init tee_bnxt_fw_mod_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return driver_register(&tee_bnxt_fw_driver.driver);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __exit tee_bnxt_fw_mod_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + driver_unregister(&tee_bnxt_fw_driver.driver);
> > +}
> > +
> > +module_init(tee_bnxt_fw_mod_init);
> > +module_exit(tee_bnxt_fw_mod_exit);
>
> Someone should add a module_tee_driver macro, perhaps?
Not clear on this comment
>
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Broadcom");
>
> I think you can forego the author macro is it's a company.
will update it to individual
>
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Broadcom bnxt firmware manager");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h b/include/linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f24c82d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/firmware/broadcom/tee_bnxt_fw.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2019 Broadcom.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _BROADCOM_TEE_BNXT_FW_H
> > +#define _BROADCOM_TEE_BNXT_FW_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +int tee_bnxt_fw_load(void);
> > +int tee_bnxt_copy_coredump(void *buf, u32 offset, u32 size);
> > +
> > +#endif /* _BROADCOM_TEE_BNXT_FW_H */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists